Moonbeam vs Acala Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Moonbeam TPS is 0.44 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
0.44 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Moonbeam max TPS is 29.3 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
29.3 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 58.4 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
58.4 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Moonbeam transaction volume is 1.58K txns, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
1.58K txns
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Moonbeam block time is 7.01s, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
7.01s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Moonbeam finality is 30s, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
30s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

Moonbeam is a parachain, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
Parachain
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Moonbeam has 84M total transactions, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
84M txns
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Moonbeam was launched on Jan 11, 2022, while the Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
Jan 11, 2022
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Moonbeam vs Acala Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 178, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
178
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Moonbeam has 600 validators, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
600
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Moonbeam stake is $1.351B, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$1.351B
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
Nominated Proof of Stake
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Moonbeam governance is on-chain, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
On-chain
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Moonbeam vs Acala Developer Activity

Developers

Moonbeam has 217 developers, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
217
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Moonbeam has 14,567 commits, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
14,567
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Moonbeam has 31 repos, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
31
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Moonbeam has 1,394 stars, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
1,394
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Moonbeam has 200 watchers, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
200
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Moonbeam vs Acala Financials New

Chain Revenue

Moonbeam chain revenue is $11.73, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$11.73
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Moonbeam average transaction fee is $0.0002579, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$0.0002579
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Moonbeam market cap is $13.17M, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$13.17M
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Moonbeam FDV is $14.81M, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$14.81M
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Moonbeam Market Cap to FDV ratio is 88.96%, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
88.96%
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Moonbeam price is $0.01215, while Acala has no data

Moonbeam logo
$0.01215
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Moonbeam

Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

Blockchains Socials

Moonbeam Socials

Acala Socials