Manta Network vs Arbitrum

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 60.38 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
60.38 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 217K txns

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
217K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Neither Manta Network nor Arbitrum have data for total transactions

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Manta Network and Arbitrum have no data

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,308 developers

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
2,308

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,898 commits

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
184,898

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,311 stars

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
10,311

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,714

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Manta Network

Manta Network is the largest modular L2, bringing the highest throughput and lowest fees to enable scalable adoption for over 200 decentralized applications. Secured by Celestia and OP Stack.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Manta Network Socials

Arbitrum Socials