Manta Network vs Arbitrum
Manta Network vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 30.31 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 109,129 txns
Block Time
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Manta Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Manta Network and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Manta Network Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Manta Network
Manta Network is the largest modular L2, bringing the highest throughput and lowest fees to enable scalable adoption for over 200 decentralized applications. Secured by Celestia and OP Stack.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.