Manta Network vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 26.04 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
26.04 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 93.7K txns

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
93.7K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1.78B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Manta Network and Arbitrum have no data

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,370 developers

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
2,370

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,674 commits

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
189,674

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,548 stars

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
10,548

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,615

Data from Chainspect

Manta Network vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $19.76K

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
$19.76K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005517

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.005517

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.183B

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.183B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.106B

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
$2.106B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Manta Network has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2106

Manta Network logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.2106

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Manta Network

Manta Network is the largest modular L2, bringing the highest throughput and lowest fees to enable scalable adoption for over 200 decentralized applications. Secured by Celestia and OP Stack.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Manta Network Socials

Arbitrum Socials