Klever vs Polygon Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Klever has no data, while Polygon TPS is 67.76 tx/s

Klever logo
Polygon logo
67.76 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Klever has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 537.5 tx/s

Klever logo
Polygon logo
537.5 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Klever has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s

Klever logo
Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Klever has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 244K txns

Klever logo
Polygon logo
244K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Klever has no data, while Polygon block time is 3.27s

Klever logo
Polygon logo
3.27s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Klever has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s

Klever logo
Polygon logo
5s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Klever has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain

Klever logo
Polygon logo
Sidechain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 6.08B total transactions

Klever logo
Polygon logo
6.08B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Klever has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020

Klever logo
Polygon logo
May 30, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Klever vs Polygon Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Klever has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4

Klever logo
Polygon logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators

Klever logo
Polygon logo
104

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Klever has no data, while Polygon stake is $359.2M

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$359.2M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Klever has no data, while Polygon is PoS

Klever logo
Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Klever has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain

Klever logo
Polygon logo
Off-chain

Data from Chainspect

Klever vs Polygon Developer Activity

Developers

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 1,694 developers

Klever logo
Polygon logo
1,694

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 63,061 commits

Klever logo
Polygon logo
63,061

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 154 repos

Klever logo
Polygon logo
154

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 9,309 stars

Klever logo
Polygon logo
9,309

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Klever has no data, while Polygon has 1,736 watchers

Klever logo
Polygon logo
1,736

Data from Chainspect

Klever vs Polygon Financials New

Chain Revenue

Klever has no data, while Polygon chain revenue is $16.33K

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$16.33K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Klever has no data, while Polygon average transaction fee is $0.002391

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$0.002391

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Klever has no data, while Polygon market cap is $1.121B

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$1.121B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Klever has no data, while Polygon FDV is $1.121B

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$1.121B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Klever has no data, while Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%

Klever logo
Polygon logo
100.00%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Klever has no data, while Polygon price is $0.1062

Klever logo
Polygon logo
$0.1062

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Klever

Klever is a layer 1 blockchain technology platform designed to offer a seamless, secure, and scalable foundation for decentralized applications (dApps) and digital assets. It aims to simplify blockchain technology for developers and users alike, making blockchain more accessible for everyday applications.

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

Blockchains Socials

Klever Socials

Polygon Socials