Injective vs Polygon Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Injective has no data, while Polygon TPS is 61.62 tx/s

Injective logo
Polygon logo
61.62 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Injective has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 537.5 tx/s

Injective logo
Polygon logo
537.5 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Injective has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s

Injective logo
Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Injective has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 222K txns

Injective logo
Polygon logo
222K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Injective has no data, while Polygon block time is 2s

Injective logo
Polygon logo
2s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Injective has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s

Injective logo
Polygon logo
5s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Injective has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain

Injective logo
Polygon logo
Sidechain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 6.2B total transactions

Injective logo
Polygon logo
6.2B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Injective has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020

Injective logo
Polygon logo
May 30, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Injective vs Polygon Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Injective has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4

Injective logo
Polygon logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators

Injective logo
Polygon logo
104

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Injective has no data, while Polygon stake is $361.1M

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$361.1M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Injective has no data, while Polygon is PoS

Injective logo
Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Injective has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain

Injective logo
Polygon logo
Off-chain

Data from Chainspect

Injective vs Polygon Developer Activity

Developers

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 1,697 developers

Injective logo
Polygon logo
1,697

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 63,170 commits

Injective logo
Polygon logo
63,170

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 158 repos

Injective logo
Polygon logo
158

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 9,330 stars

Injective logo
Polygon logo
9,330

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Injective has no data, while Polygon has 1,737 watchers

Injective logo
Polygon logo
1,737

Data from Chainspect

Injective vs Polygon Financials New

Chain Revenue

Injective has no data, while Polygon chain revenue is $399.2K

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$399.2K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Injective has no data, while Polygon average transaction fee is $0.06773

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$0.06773

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Injective has no data, while Polygon market cap is $1.321B

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$1.321B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Injective has no data, while Polygon FDV is $1.321B

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$1.321B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Injective has no data, while Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%

Injective logo
Polygon logo
100.00%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Injective has no data, while Polygon price is $0.1251

Injective logo
Polygon logo
$0.1251

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Injective

Injective is the high-performance blockchain for finance, offering unmatched speed, scalability, and advanced infrastructure to power the future of on-chain finance.

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

Blockchains Socials

Injective Socials

Polygon Socials