Injective vs Arbitrum
Injective vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 16.42 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 59,123 txns
Block Time
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Injective vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Injective and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Injective has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Injective Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Injective
Injective is the high-performance blockchain for finance, offering unmatched speed, scalability, and advanced infrastructure to power the future of on-chain finance.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.