- Compare
- Frequency vs Crust
Frequency vs Crust Scalability
Real-time TPS
Frequency has no data, while Crust TPS is 0 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Frequency has no data, while Crust max TPS is 0.06 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Frequency has no data, while Crust max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Frequency has no data, while Crust transaction volume is 0 txns
Block Time
Frequency has no data, while Crust block time is 15.14s
Finality
Frequency has no data, while Crust finality is 30s
Type
Frequency has no data, while Crust is a parachain
Launch Date
Frequency has no data, while Crust was launched on Nov 21, 2022
Frequency vs Crust Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Frequency has no data, while Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174
Validators/Miners
Frequency has no data, while Crust has 600 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Frequency has no data, while Crust stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Frequency has no data, while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Frequency has no data, while Crust governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Frequency Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.