Electroneum vs Crust
Real-time TPS
Electroneum TPS is 100% more than Crust TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Electroneum max TPS is 386X more than Crust max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Electroneum max theoretical TPS is 80.95% less than Crust max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Electroneum transaction volume is 100% more than Crust transaction volume
Block Time
Electroneum block time is 68.88% less than Crust block time
Finality
Electroneum finality is 100% less than Crust finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Electroneum and Crust nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Electroneum and Crust active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Electroneum council governance is worse than Crust on-chain governance
Type
Electroneum is a layer 1 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Launch Date
Electroneum was launched 5 years before Crust
Electroneum vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Electroneum Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Electroneum
Electroneum is a Layer 1 EVM-compatible blockchain, catering to 4+ million users worldwide. The network boasts transaction speeds of just 5 seconds with instant finality and potentially the lowest smart contract fees available. Powered by the IBFT consensus mechanism and supported by known validators (targeting universities and Web3 infrastructure companies), the network is incredibly fast, secure and energy efficient.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.