Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 99.99% less than Base TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 99.99% less than Base max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 1.05X more than Base max theoretical TPS
Total Transactions
Crust total txns is 99.99% less than Base total txns
Block Time
Crust block time is 6.2X more than Base block time
Finality
Crust finality is 93.75% less than Base finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Crust and Base nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Crust and Base active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Crust on-chain governance is better than Base off-chain governance
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Base is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Crust was launched 9 months before Base
Crust vs Base Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Base
Base, an Ethereum-based blockchain developed by Coinbase, operates as a Layer 2 (L2) network, leveraging Optimism to provide a secure, cost-effective, and user-friendly environment for decentralized application (dApp) development. With a mission to onboard the next billion users to web3, Base ensures near-zero fees, quick transactions, and robust security supported by Ethereum's infrastructure. At its launch, Base had over 100 dApps and service providers, aiming to solve the blockchain trilemma by prioritizing interoperability and composability among participating rollups. This approach enhances scalability while preserving security and decentralization.