Chromia vs Polygon
Chromia vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Chromia has no data, while Polygon TPS is 39.93 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Chromia has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Chromia has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Chromia has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 143,744 txns
Block Time
Chromia has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Chromia has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Chromia has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Chromia has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Chromia vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Chromia has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Chromia has no data, while Polygon stake is $902.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Chromia has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Chromia has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Chromia vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 1,653 developers
Repos
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 61,384 commits
Stars
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 9,099 stars
Watchers
Chromia has no data, while Polygon has 1,802 watchers
Other Comparisons
Chromia Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Chromia
Chromia - an innovative Layer-1 relational blockchain platform that uses a modular framework to enable the creation of complex, fully on-chain dapps.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.