Berachain vs Polygon
Berachain vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Berachain has no data, while Polygon TPS is 46.75 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Berachain has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Berachain has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Berachain has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 168,284 txns
Block Time
Berachain has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.12s
Finality
Berachain has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Berachain has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Berachain has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Berachain vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Berachain has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Berachain has no data, while Polygon stake is $902.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Berachain has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Berachain has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Berachain vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 1,653 developers
Repos
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 61,388 commits
Stars
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 9,100 stars
Watchers
Berachain has no data, while Polygon has 1,802 watchers
Other Comparisons
Berachain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Berachain
Berachain is a high-performance EVM-Identical Layer 1 blockchain utilizing Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) and built on top of the modular EVM-focused consensus client framework BeaconKit.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.