Arbitrum vs IOTA Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 21.07 tx/s, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
21.07 tx/s
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 75.9K txns, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
75.9K txns
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 1.83B total transactions, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.83B txns
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs IOTA Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum and IOTA have no data

Arbitrum logo
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs IOTA Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2,374 developers, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,374
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 189,941 commits, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
189,941
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 129 repos, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
129
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 10,592 stars, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,592
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1,618 watchers, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,618
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs IOTA Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $6.427K, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
$6.427K
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.003395, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.003395
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $1.147B, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.147B
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $2.006B, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
$2.006B
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 57.19%, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
57.19%
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.2006, while IOTA has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.2006
IOTA logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About IOTA

IOTA is the first distributed ledger built for the “Internet of Everything” - a network for exchanging value and data between humans and machines.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

IOTA Socials