Compare Arbitrum vs Acala

Arbitrum TPS is 29.64 tx/s, while Acala has no data

29.64 tx/s

—

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s, while Acala has no data

1,402 tx/s

—

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while Acala has no data

6,095 tx/s

—

Arbitrum transaction volume is 107K txns, while Acala has no data

107K txns

—

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Acala has no data

0.25s

—

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Acala has no data

13m 48s

—

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Acala has no data

Layer 2 blockchain

—

Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions, while Acala has no data

1.78B txns

—

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Acala has no data

Aug 31, 2021

—

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Acala has no data

1

—

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Acala has no data

1

—

Arbitrum and Acala have no data

—

—

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Acala has no data

Rollup (Optimistic)

—

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Acala has no data

On-chain

—

Arbitrum has 2,370 developers, while Acala has no data

2,370

—

Arbitrum has 189,698 commits, while Acala has no data

189,698

—

Arbitrum has 129 repos, while Acala has no data

129

—

Arbitrum has 10,549 stars, while Acala has no data

10,549

—

Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers, while Acala has no data

1,615

—

Arbitrum chain revenue is $20.88K, while Acala has no data

$20.88K

—

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.007471, while Acala has no data

$0.007471

—

Arbitrum market cap is $1.157B, while Acala has no data

$1.157B

—

Arbitrum FDV is $2.06B, while Acala has no data

$2.06B

—

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%, while Acala has no data

56.18%

—

Arbitrum price is $0.206, while Acala has no data

$0.206

—