Arbitrum vs Acala

Arbitrum vs Acala Scalability

Real-time TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum TPS is 25.27 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
25.27 tx/s
Acala logo

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Chainspect

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
Acala logo

Max Theoretical TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Acala logo

Transaction Volume

Chainspect

Arbitrum transaction volume is 90,970 txns, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
90,970 txns
Acala logo

Block Time

Chainspect

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Acala logo

Finality

Chainspect

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Acala logo

Type

Chainspect

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Acala logo

Launch Date

Chainspect

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Acala logo

Arbitrum vs Acala Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Chainspect

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Acala logo

Validators/Miners

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Acala logo

Stake/Hashrate

Chainspect

Arbitrum and Acala have no data

Arbitrum logo
Acala logo

Consensus Mechanism

Chainspect

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Acala logo

Governance

Chainspect

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Acala logo

Arbitrum vs Acala Developer Activity New

Developers

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 2,301 developers, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,301
Acala logo

Repos

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 126 repos, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
126
Acala logo

Commits

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 184,644 commits, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
184,644
Acala logo

Stars

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 10,288 stars, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,288
Acala logo

Watchers

Chainspect

Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers, while Acala has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,714
Acala logo

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Acala Socials