Arbitrum vs Acala

Real-time TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum TPS is 21.52 tx/s, while Acala TPS is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
21.52 tx/s
Acala logo
Soon

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Chainspect

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,105 tx/s, while Acala max TPS is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
1,105 tx/s
Acala logo
Soon

Max Theoretical TPS

Chainspect

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Acala max theoretical TPS is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Acala logo
Soon
New

Total Transactions

Chainspect

Arbitrum total txns is 77,469 txns, while Acala total txns is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
77,469 txns
Acala logo
Soon

Block Time

Chainspect

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Acala block time is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Acala logo
Soon

Finality

Chainspect

Arbitrum finality is 16m, while Acala finality is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
16m
Acala logo
Soon

Type

Chainspect

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Acala type is unknown

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Acala logo
Soon

Governance

Chainspect

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Acala governance is coming soon

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Acala logo
Soon

Launch Date

Chainspect

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Acala launch date is unknown

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Acala logo
Soon

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Acala Socials