Arbitrum vs Acala Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 35.73 tx/s, while Acala has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Acala has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Acala has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 128,612 txns, while Acala has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Acala has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Acala has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Acala has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Acala has no data
Arbitrum vs Acala Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Acala has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Acala has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Acala have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Acala has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Acala has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.