Ajuna vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 35.73 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 128,612 txns
Block Time
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Ajuna vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Ajuna and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Ajuna has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Ajuna Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ajuna
The Ajuna platform provides a simplified way for Unreal and Unity developers to build an incentive layer into their games using tokenized virtual goods. The partnership with Integritee will allow Ajuna to run entire gaming engines in trusted execution environments to create fast, secure, and scalable decentralized gaming ecosystems.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.