- Compare
- Aeternity vs Base
Aeternity vs Base Scalability
Real-time TPS
Aeternity TPS is 99.92% lower than Base TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Aeternity max TPS is 99.26% lower than Base max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Aeternity max theoretical TPS is 96.63% lower than Base max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Aeternity transaction volume is 99.92% lower than Base transaction volume
Block Time
Aeternity block time is 102X longer than Base block time
Finality
Aeternity finality is 4.54X longer than Base finality
Type
Aeternity is a layer 1 blockchain, while Base is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Aeternity was launched 5 years before Base
Aeternity vs Base Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Aeternity Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Base Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators/Miners
Aeternity has 3X more miners than Base has validators
Stake/Hashrate
Aeternity hashrate is 3.49 KGp/s, while Base has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Aeternity is PoW, while Base is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Aeternity on-chain governance is better than Base off-chain governance
Aeternity vs Base Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Aeternity Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Aeternity
Engineered to scale and last, æternity is an easily accessible blockchain platform for the global public. With numerous innovative functionalities and performance far ahead of earlier blockchains, æternity allows its users and community to seamlessly venture into the new era of society, economy, and digital interactions.
About Base
Base, an Ethereum-based blockchain developed by Coinbase, operates as a Layer 2 (L2) network, leveraging Optimism to provide a secure, cost-effective, and user-friendly environment for decentralized application (dApp) development. With a mission to onboard the next billion users to web3, Base ensures near-zero fees, quick transactions, and robust security supported by Ethereum's infrastructure. At its launch, Base had over 100 dApps and service providers, aiming to solve the blockchain trilemma by prioritizing interoperability and composability among participating rollups. This approach enhances scalability while preserving security and decentralization.