Acala vs TON Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Acala has no data, while TON TPS is 43.15 tx/s

Acala logo
TON logo
43.15 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Acala has no data, while TON max TPS is 1,542 tx/s

Acala logo
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Acala has no data, while TON max theoretical TPS is 104,715 tx/s

Acala logo
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Acala has no data, while TON transaction volume is 155K txns

Acala logo
TON logo
155K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Acala has no data, while TON block time is 2.68s

Acala logo
TON logo
2.68s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Acala has no data, while TON finality is 6s

Acala logo
TON logo
6s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Acala has no data, while TON is a layer 1 blockchain

Acala logo
TON logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Acala has no data, while TON has 2.84B total transactions

Acala logo
TON logo
2.84B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Acala has no data, while TON was launched on May 26, 2021

Acala logo
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs TON Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Acala has no data, while TON Nakamoto Coefficient is 80

Acala logo
TON logo
80

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Acala has no data, while TON has 375 validators

Acala logo
TON logo
375

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Acala has no data, while TON stake is $653.8M

Acala logo
TON logo
$653.8M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Acala has no data, while TON is PoS

Acala logo
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Acala has no data, while TON governance is on-chain

Acala logo
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs TON Developer Activity

Developers

Acala has no data, while TON has 575 developers

Acala logo
TON logo
575

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Acala has no data, while TON has 23,582 commits

Acala logo
TON logo
23,582

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Acala has no data, while TON has 176 repos

Acala logo
TON logo
176

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Acala has no data, while TON has 15,110 stars

Acala logo
TON logo
15,110

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Acala has no data, while TON has 1,504 watchers

Acala logo
TON logo
1,504

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs TON Financials New

Chain Revenue

Acala has no data, while TON chain revenue is $9.455K

Acala logo
TON logo
$9.455K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Acala has no data, while TON average transaction fee is $0.004445

Acala logo
TON logo
$0.004445

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Acala has no data, while TON market cap is $3.842B

Acala logo
TON logo
$3.842B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Acala has no data, while TON FDV is $8.065B

Acala logo
TON logo
$8.065B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Acala has no data, while TON Market Cap to FDV ratio is 47.64%

Acala logo
TON logo
47.64%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Acala has no data, while TON price is $1.566

Acala logo
TON logo
$1.566

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

About TON

The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.

Blockchains Socials

Acala Socials

TON Socials