Real-time TPS
Chainspect
Acala TPS is coming soon, while Redbelly TPS is 0.01 tx/s
Soon
0.01 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Chainspect
Acala max TPS is coming soon, while Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s
Soon
73,158 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Chainspect
Acala max theoretical TPS is coming soon, while Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s
Soon
666,970 tx/s
New
Total Transactions
Chainspect
Acala total txns is coming soon, while Redbelly total txns is 39 txns
Soon
39 txns
Block Time
Chainspect
Acala block time is coming soon, while Redbelly block time is 1m 34s
Soon
1m 34s
Finality
Chainspect
Acala finality is coming soon, while Redbelly finality is 0s
Soon
0s
Nakamoto Coefficient
Chainspect
Acala and Redbelly nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Soon
Soon
Active Addresses
Chainspect
Acala and Redbelly active addresses are both coming soon
Soon
Soon
Governance
Chainspect
Acala governance is coming soon, while Redbelly governance is council
Soon
Council
Type
Chainspect
Acala type is unknown, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Soon
Layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Chainspect
The Acala launch date is unknown, while Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024
Soon
Nov 28, 2024
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
- Acala vs Acala
- Acala vs Ajuna Network
- Acala vs Astar
- Acala vs Bifrost
- Acala vs Crust
- Acala vs Frequency
- Acala vs Hydration
- Acala vs Integritee
- Acala vs Litentry
- Acala vs Mythos
- Acala vs Moonbeam
- Acala vs NeuroWeb
- Acala vs peaq
- Acala vs Pendulum
- Acala vs Phala Network
- Acala vs Robonomics
- Acala vs Polkadot Ecosystem
- Acala vs Zeitgeist
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.