- Compare
- Acala vs Redbelly
Acala vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acala has no data, while Redbelly TPS is 0.02 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Acala has no data, while Redbelly transaction volume is 54 txns
Block Time
Acala has no data, while Redbelly block time is 1m 4s
Finality
Acala has no data, while Redbelly finality is 0s
Type
Acala has no data, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024
Acala vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala and Redbelly have no data
Validators/Miners
Acala and Redbelly have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Acala and Redbelly have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Redbelly is PoS
Governance
Acala has no data, while Redbelly governance is council
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.