Compare Acala vs Redbelly

Acala vs Redbelly Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Acala has no data, while Redbelly TPS is 0.0092 tx/s

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
0.0092 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Acala has no data, while Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
73,158 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Acala has no data, while Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
666,970 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Acala has no data, while Redbelly transaction volume is 33 txns

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
33 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Acala has no data, while Redbelly block time is 1m 52s

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
1m 52s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Acala has no data, while Redbelly finality is 0s

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Acala has no data, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 6.14M total transactions

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
6.14M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Acala has no data, while Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
Nov 28, 2024

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Redbelly Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Acala and Redbelly have no data

Acala logo
Redbelly logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Acala and Redbelly have no data

Acala logo
Redbelly logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Acala and Redbelly have no data

Acala logo
Redbelly logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Acala has no data, while Redbelly is PoS

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Acala has no data, while Redbelly governance is council

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
Council

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Redbelly Developer Activity

Developers

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 9 developers

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
9

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 4 repos

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 316 commits

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
316

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 1 star

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Acala has no data, while Redbelly has 8 watchers

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
8

Data from Chainspect

Acala vs Redbelly Financials New

Chain Revenue

Acala has no data, while Redbelly chain revenue is $27.99

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
$27.99

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Acala has no data, while Redbelly average transaction fee is $0.03948

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
$0.03948

Data from Chainspect

Price

Acala has no data, while Redbelly price is $0.005739

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
$0.005739

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Acala has no data, while Redbelly market cap is $13.39M

Acala logo
Redbelly logo
$13.39M

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

About Redbelly

Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.

Blockchains Socials

Acala Socials

Redbelly Socials