Compare Scroll vs Starknet
Open in ChatGPTScroll vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Scroll TPS is 68.73% lower than Starknet TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 57.95% lower than Starknet max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 86.28% lower than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Scroll transaction volume is 68.73% lower than Starknet transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Scroll block time is 32.22% shorter than Starknet block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Scroll finality is 1.45X longer than Starknet finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Scroll and Starknet are both layer 2 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Scroll has 51.48% fewer total transactions than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 2 years after Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Starknet Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Scroll and Starknet have the same amount of validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Scroll and Starknet have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll and Starknet are both Rollup (ZK)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Starknet Developer Activity
Developers
Scroll has 25.95% fewer developers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Scroll has 16.2% fewer commits than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Scroll has 2.85X more repos than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Scroll has 1.58X more stars than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Scroll has 5.8X more watchers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Starknet Financials New
Chain Revenue
Scroll chain revenue is 92.21% lower than Starknet chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Scroll average transaction fee is 77.71% lower than Starknet average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Scroll market cap is 96.41% lower than Starknet market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Scroll FDV is 89.73% lower than Starknet FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Scroll Market Cap to FDV ratio is 65.12% lower than Starknet Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Scroll price is 1.03X higher than Starknet price
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Starknet Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.