- Compare
- Scroll vs Starknet
Scroll vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Scroll TPS is 53.34% lower than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 66.81% lower than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 86.28% lower than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Scroll transaction volume is 53.35% lower than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Scroll block time is 81.92% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
Scroll finality is 1.45X longer than Starknet finality
Type
Scroll and Starknet are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 2 years after Starknet
Scroll vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Scroll and Starknet have the same amount of validators
Stake
Scroll and Starknet have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll and Starknet are both Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance
Scroll vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.