Real-time TPS
Litentry TPS is coming soon, while Polygon TPS is 39 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Litentry max TPS is coming soon, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Litentry max theoretical TPS is coming soon, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Total Transactions
Litentry total txns is coming soon, while Polygon total txns is 140,402 txns
Block Time
Litentry block time is coming soon, while Polygon block time is 2.14s
Finality
Litentry finality is coming soon, while Polygon finality is 4m 16s
Type
Litentry type is unknown, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Litentry governance is coming soon, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Launch Date
The Litentry launch date is unknown, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Other Comparisons
Litentry Comparisons
- Litentry vs Acala
- Litentry vs Ajuna Network
- Litentry vs Astar
- Litentry vs Bifrost
- Litentry vs Crust
- Litentry vs Frequency
- Litentry vs Hydration
- Litentry vs Integritee
- Litentry vs Litentry
- Litentry vs Mythos
- Litentry vs Moonbeam
- Litentry vs NeuroWeb
- Litentry vs peaq
- Litentry vs Pendulum
- Litentry vs Phala Network
- Litentry vs Robonomics
- Litentry vs Polkadot
- Litentry vs Zeitgeist
About Blockchains
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.