Litentry vs Arbitrum
Litentry vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 17.41 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 62,674 txns
Block Time
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Litentry vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Litentry and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Litentry vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,298 developers
Repos
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,536 commits
Stars
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,276 stars
Watchers
Litentry has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Litentry Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.