IOTA vs Arbitrum
IOTA vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 33.52 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 120,689 txns
Block Time
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
IOTA vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
IOTA and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
IOTA has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
IOTA Comparisons
About Blockchains
About IOTA
IOTA is the first distributed ledger built for the “Internet of Everything” - a network for exchanging value and data between humans and machines.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.