Ice Open Network vs Arbitrum
Ice Open Network vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 33.52 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 120,689 txns
Block Time
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Ice Open Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Ice Open Network and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Ice Open Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Ice Open Network Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ice Open Network
Ice Open Network is a fast and scalable Layer-1 blockchain built to bring the Internet on-chain, ensuring that every app empowers users with control over their data, identity, and digital interactions.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.