- Compare
- Hydration vs Polygon
Hydration vs Polygon
Hydration vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Hydration has no data, while Polygon TPS is 38.3 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Hydration has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Hydration has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Hydration has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 137,889 txns
Block Time
Hydration has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Hydration has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Hydration has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Hydration has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Hydration vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Hydration has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Hydration has no data, while Polygon stake is $918.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Hydration has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Hydration has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Hydration vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 1,652 developers
Repos
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 147 repos
Commits
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 61,311 commits
Stars
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 9,081 stars
Watchers
Hydration has no data, while Polygon has 1,767 watchers
Other Comparisons
Hydration Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Hydration
Hydration provides a cost-efficient, permissionless platform for market making any asset, without hidden costs or listing fees.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.