Frequency vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 21.62 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
21.62 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 77.8K txns

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
77.8K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.85B total transactions

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1.85B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Frequency vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Frequency and Arbitrum have no data

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Frequency vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,376 developers

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
2,376

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 190,122 commits

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
190,122

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,617 stars

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
10,617

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,617 watchers

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

Frequency vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $22.53K

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
$22.53K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.0109

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.0109

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.275B

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.275B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.229B

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
$2.229B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 57.19%

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
57.19%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2229

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.2229

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Frequency

Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Frequency Socials

Arbitrum Socials