Frequency vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 35.73 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 128,612 txns
Block Time
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Frequency vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Frequency and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Frequency Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.