Frequency vs Arbitrum

Frequency vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.48 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
31.48 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 113K txns

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
113K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.57B total transactions

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1.57B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Frequency vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Frequency and Arbitrum have no data

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Frequency vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,317 developers

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
2,317

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 185,174 commits

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
185,174

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,340 stars

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
10,340

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Frequency has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers

Frequency logo
Arbitrum logo
1,714

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Frequency

Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Frequency Socials

Arbitrum Socials