Real-time TPS
eCash TPS is 100% more than Crust TPS
Max Recorded TPS
eCash max TPS is 11X more than Crust max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 97.67% less than Crust max theoretical TPS
Block Time
eCash block time is 47X more than Crust block time
Finality
eCash finality is 9.67X more than Crust finality
Type
eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than Crust on-chain governance
Launch Date
eCash was launched 2 years before Crust
eCash vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.