Crust vs Polygon

Crust vs Polygon Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Crust TPS is 100% lower than Polygon TPS

Crust logo
0 tx/s
Polygon logo
48.75 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Crust max TPS is 99.98% lower than Polygon max TPS

Crust logo
0.06 tx/s
Polygon logo
429.1 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Crust max theoretical TPS is 2.1X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS

Crust logo
1,500 tx/s
Polygon logo
714.3 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Crust transaction volume is 100% lower than Polygon transaction volume

Crust logo
0 txns
Polygon logo
176K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Crust block time is 6.23X longer than Polygon block time

Crust logo
13.23s
Polygon logo
2.13s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Crust finality is 6X longer than Polygon finality

Crust logo
30s
Polygon logo
5s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Crust is a parachain, while Polygon is a sidechain

Crust logo
Parachain
Polygon logo
Sidechain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Crust has no data, while Polygon has 5.7B total transactions

Crust logo
—
Polygon logo
5.7B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Crust was launched 2 years after Polygon

Crust logo
Nov 21, 2022
Polygon logo
May 30, 2020

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Polygon Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 37X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient

Crust logo
183
Polygon logo
5

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Crust has 5.77X more validators than Polygon

Crust logo
600
Polygon logo
104

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Crust stake is 4.16X higher than Polygon stake

Crust logo
$3.433B
Polygon logo
$824.9M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Polygon is PoS

Crust logo
Nominated Proof of Stake
Polygon logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Crust on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance

Crust logo
On-chain
Polygon logo
Off-chain

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Polygon Developer Activity New

Developers

Crust has 89.25% fewer developers than Polygon

Crust logo
178
Polygon logo
1,657

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Crust has 50.67% fewer repos than Polygon

Crust logo
73
Polygon logo
148

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Crust has 81.18% fewer commits than Polygon

Crust logo
11,661
Polygon logo
61,981

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Crust has 88.58% fewer stars than Polygon

Crust logo
1,052
Polygon logo
9,214

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Crust has 81.04% fewer watchers than Polygon

Crust logo
355
Polygon logo
1,873

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Crust

Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.

About Polygon

Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.

Blockchains Socials

Crust Socials

Polygon Socials