Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 100% less than Polygon TPS
Max Recorded TPS
Crust max TPS is 99.36% less than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 2.31X more than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Block Time
Crust block time is 5.78X more than Polygon block time
Finality
Crust finality is 76.56% less than Polygon finality
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Polygon is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Crust on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Launch Date
Crust was launched 2 years after Polygon
Crust vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
Polygon Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.