Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 100% less than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 99.99% less than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 96.25% less than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Block Time
Crust block time is 50X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Crust finality is 93.75% less than Arbitrum finality
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
Crust and Arbitrum governance are both coming soon
Launch Date
Crust was launched 1 year after Arbitrum
Crust vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.