Crust vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Crust TPS is 100% lower than Arbitrum TPS

Crust logo
0 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
28.45 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Crust max TPS is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

Crust logo
0.06 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Crust max theoretical TPS is 75.39% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

Crust logo
1,500 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Crust transaction volume is 100% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

Crust logo
0 txns
Arbitrum logo
102K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Crust block time is 66X longer than Arbitrum block time

Crust logo
16.49s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Crust finality is 96.37% shorter than Arbitrum finality

Crust logo
30s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Crust is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Crust logo
Parachain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Crust has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.73B total transactions

Crust logo
—
Arbitrum logo
1.73B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Crust was launched 1 year after Arbitrum

Crust logo
Nov 21, 2022
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 178X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Crust logo
178
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Crust has 600X more validators than Arbitrum

Crust logo
600
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Crust stake is $1.899B, while Arbitrum has no data

Crust logo
$1.899B
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Crust logo
Nominated Proof of Stake
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Crust and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

Crust logo
On-chain
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Crust has 92.46% fewer developers than Arbitrum

Crust logo
178
Arbitrum logo
2,362

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Crust has 41.4% fewer repos than Arbitrum

Crust logo
75
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Crust has 93.82% fewer commits than Arbitrum

Crust logo
11,696
Arbitrum logo
189,289

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Crust has 89.9% fewer stars than Arbitrum

Crust logo
1,059
Arbitrum logo
10,492

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Crust has 78.41% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

Crust logo
349
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Crust has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $18.13K

Crust logo
—
Arbitrum logo
$18.13K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Crust has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.006229

Crust logo
—
Arbitrum logo
$0.006229

Data from Chainspect

Price

Crust price is 81.53% lower than Arbitrum price

Crust logo
$0.03994
Arbitrum logo
$0.2163

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Crust market cap is 99.95% lower than Arbitrum market cap

Crust logo
$564.7K
Arbitrum logo
$1.215B

Data from Chainspect

Crust vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Crust

Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Crust Socials

Arbitrum Socials