Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 100% less than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 99.99% less than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 96.25% less than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Crust transaction volume is 100% less than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Crust block time is 82X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Crust finality is 93.75% less than Arbitrum finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Crust and Arbitrum nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Crust and Arbitrum active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Crust and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Crust was launched 1 year after Arbitrum
Crust vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.