Cronos vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Cronos TPS is 86.25% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Cronos max TPS is 89.56% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Cronos max theoretical TPS is 86.52% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Cronos transaction volume is 86.25% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Cronos block time is 2.17X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Cronos finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Cronos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Cronos was launched 2 months after Arbitrum
Cronos vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Cronos Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Cronos has 100X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Cronos stake is $1.65B, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Cronos is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Cronos and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Cronos vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Cronos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Cronos
Cronos emerges as an interoperable blockchain, streamlining the migration of applications and crypto assets from various chains while prioritizing low transaction costs, rapid throughput, and fast finalization times. It operates as an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chain, augmented with support for Inter-Blockchain Communications (IBC) networks based on the Cosmos SDK. This integration empowers developers to create and launch dApps atop the EVM infrastructure.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.