Algorand 
Aptos 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Cronos vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTCronos vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Cronos TPS is 98.39% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Cronos max TPS is 93.03% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Cronos max theoretical TPS is 11.57% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Cronos transaction volume is 98.39% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Cronos block time is 1.97X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Cronos finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Cronos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Cronos has 94.77% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Cronos was launched 2 months after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Cronos vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Cronos Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Cronos has 100X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Cronos stake is $805.7M, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Cronos is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Cronos and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Cronos vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Cronos has 73.06% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Cronos has 90.26% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Cronos has 77.51% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Cronos has 89.26% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Cronos has 90.98% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Cronos vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Cronos chain revenue is 98.09% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Cronos average transaction fee is 1.67X higher than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Cronos market cap is 5.31X higher than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Cronos FDV is 7.33X higher than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Cronos Market Cap to FDV ratio is 27.61% lower than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Cronos price is 26.7% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Cronos vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Cronos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Cronos
Cronos emerges as an interoperable blockchain, streamlining the migration of applications and crypto assets from various chains while prioritizing low transaction costs, rapid throughput, and fast finalization times. It operates as an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chain, augmented with support for Inter-Blockchain Communications (IBC) networks based on the Cosmos SDK. This integration empowers developers to create and launch dApps atop the EVM infrastructure.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.