Compare Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem
Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Celo TPS is 2.85X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Celo max TPS is 42.04% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Celo max theoretical TPS is 99.52% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Celo transaction volume is 2.85X higher than Polkadot Ecosystem transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Celo block time is 83.41% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Celo finality is 50X longer than Polkadot Ecosystem finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Celo is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polkadot Ecosystem is a blockchain ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Celo has 1.53X more total transactions than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Celo was launched 1 month before Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Celo Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.43% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Celo has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Celo has no data, while Polkadot Ecosystem stake is $2.081B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Celo is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot Ecosystem is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Celo and Polkadot Ecosystem governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem Developer Activity
Developers
Celo has 82.3% fewer developers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Celo has 61.77% fewer repos than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Celo has 89.49% fewer commits than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Celo has 90.93% fewer stars than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Celo has 70.21% fewer watchers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem Financials New
Chain Revenue
Celo chain revenue is $1.202K, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Celo average transaction fee is $0.0007494, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Celo price is 90.99% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem price
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Celo market cap is 96.75% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem market cap
Data from Chainspect
Celo vs Polkadot Ecosystem Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Celo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.
About Polkadot Ecosystem
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.