Compare BNB Greenfield vs Sonic

BNB Greenfield vs Sonic Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

BNB Greenfield TPS is 94.88% lower than Sonic TPS

BNB Greenfield logo
0.19 tx/s
Sonic logo
3.65 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

BNB Greenfield max TPS is 96.05% lower than Sonic max TPS

BNB Greenfield logo
44.96 tx/s
Sonic logo
1,139 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

BNB Greenfield max theoretical TPS is 99.87% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS

BNB Greenfield logo
500 tx/s
Sonic logo
396,825 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

BNB Greenfield transaction volume is 94.88% lower than Sonic transaction volume

BNB Greenfield logo
673 txns
Sonic logo
13.2K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

BNB Greenfield block time is 3.75X longer than Sonic block time

BNB Greenfield logo
2.51s
Sonic logo
0.67s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

BNB Greenfield finality is the same as Sonic finality

BNB Greenfield logo
0s
Sonic logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Type

BNB Greenfield and Sonic are both layer 1 blockchains

BNB Greenfield logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Sonic logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

BNB Greenfield has 75.7% fewer total transactions than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
33.9M txns
Sonic logo
140M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

BNB Greenfield was launched 1 year before Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
Oct 17, 2023
Sonic logo
Dec 1, 2024

Data from Chainspect

BNB Greenfield vs Sonic Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

BNB Greenfield Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient

BNB Greenfield logo
4
Sonic logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators

BNB Greenfield has 72.5% fewer validators than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
11
Sonic logo
40

Data from Chainspect

Stake

BNB Greenfield stake is 96.35% lower than Sonic stake

BNB Greenfield logo
$14.39M
Sonic logo
$394.7M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

BNB Greenfield and Sonic are both PoS

BNB Greenfield logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Sonic logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

BNB Greenfield and Sonic governance are both on-chain

BNB Greenfield logo
On-chain
Sonic logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

BNB Greenfield vs Sonic Developer Activity New

Developers

BNB Greenfield has 37X more developers than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
3,791
Sonic logo
102

Data from Chainspect

Repos

BNB Greenfield has 12X more repos than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
144
Sonic logo
12

Data from Chainspect

Commits

BNB Greenfield has 12X more commits than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
165,937
Sonic logo
13,805

Data from Chainspect

Stars

BNB Greenfield has 184X more stars than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
13,583
Sonic logo
74

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

BNB Greenfield has 20X more watchers than Sonic

BNB Greenfield logo
1,682
Sonic logo
84

Data from Chainspect

BNB Greenfield vs Sonic Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About BNB Greenfield

Positioned as the third blockchain within the BNB Chain ecosystem BNB Greenfield utilizes BNB as its native token. In essence, BNB Greenfield aims to offer decentralized storage infrastructure within the expansive BNB Chain ecosystem. This empowers users and dApps to generate, store, and exchange data while retaining full ownership. The potential outcome is the emergence of a new data-centric economy, enabling all participants within the BNB Chain ecosystem to possess, utilize, and monetize data.

About Sonic

Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.

By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.

Blockchains Socials

BNB Greenfield Socials

Sonic Socials