Compare BNB Greenfield vs Crust
Open in ChatGPTBNB Greenfield vs Crust Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
BNB Greenfield TPS is 100% higher than Crust TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
BNB Greenfield max TPS is 789X higher than Crust max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
BNB Greenfield max theoretical TPS is 66.66% lower than Crust max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
BNB Greenfield transaction volume is 100% higher than Crust transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
BNB Greenfield block time is 83.08% shorter than Crust block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
BNB Greenfield finality is 100% shorter than Crust finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
BNB Greenfield is a layer 1 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
BNB Greenfield has 35M total transactions, while Crust has no data
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
BNB Greenfield was launched 11 months after Crust
Data from Chainspect
BNB Greenfield vs Crust Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
BNB Greenfield Nakamoto Coefficient is 97.75% lower than Crust Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
BNB Greenfield has 98.16% fewer validators than Crust
Data from Chainspect
Stake
BNB Greenfield stake is 99.49% lower than Crust stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
BNB Greenfield is PoS, while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
BNB Greenfield and Crust governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
BNB Greenfield vs Crust Developer Activity
Developers
BNB Greenfield has 21X more developers than Crust
Data from Chainspect
Repos
BNB Greenfield has 1.93X more repos than Crust
Data from Chainspect
Commits
BNB Greenfield has 14X more commits than Crust
Data from Chainspect
Stars
BNB Greenfield has 13X more stars than Crust
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
BNB Greenfield has 4.84X more watchers than Crust
Data from Chainspect
BNB Greenfield vs Crust Financials New
Chain Revenue
BNB Greenfield chain revenue is $29.46, while Crust has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
BNB Greenfield average transaction fee is $0.002647, while Crust has no data
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
BNB Greenfield has no data, while Crust market cap is $666.7K
Data from Chainspect
FDV
BNB Greenfield has no data, while Crust FDV is $1.652M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
BNB Greenfield has no data, while Crust Market Cap to FDV ratio is 40.37%
Data from Chainspect
Price
BNB Greenfield has no data, while Crust price is $0.04716
Data from Chainspect
BNB Greenfield vs Crust Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
BNB Greenfield Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About BNB Greenfield
Positioned as the third blockchain within the BNB Chain ecosystem BNB Greenfield utilizes BNB as its native token. In essence, BNB Greenfield aims to offer decentralized storage infrastructure within the expansive BNB Chain ecosystem. This empowers users and dApps to generate, store, and exchange data while retaining full ownership. The potential outcome is the emergence of a new data-centric economy, enabling all participants within the BNB Chain ecosystem to possess, utilize, and monetize data.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.