Bitlayer vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 39.93 tx/s

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
39.93 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 144K txns

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
144K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.76B total transactions

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
1.76B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Bitlayer vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Bitlayer and Arbitrum have no data

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Bitlayer vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,364 developers

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
2,364

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,441 commits

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
189,441

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,514 stars

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
10,514

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,617 watchers

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

Bitlayer vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $10.49K

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
$10.49K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.003166

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.003166

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.172B

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.172B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.086B

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
$2.086B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Bitlayer has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2086

Bitlayer logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.2086

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Bitlayer

Bitlayer is an innovative Layer-2 solution specifically developed for the Bitcoin network. The core innovation lies in its utilization of the BitVM paradigm, which allows for the execution of smart contracts and decentralized applications (dApps) on the Bitcoin network.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Bitlayer Socials

Arbitrum Socials