- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Litentry
Arbitrum vs Litentry
Arbitrum vs Litentry Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 17.09 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 61,531 txns, while Litentry has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Litentry has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Litentry has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Litentry has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Litentry has no data
Arbitrum vs Litentry Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Litentry has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Litentry has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Litentry have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Litentry has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Litentry has no data
Arbitrum vs Litentry Developer Activity New
Developers
Arbitrum has 2,298 developers, while Litentry has no data
Repos
Arbitrum has 126 repos, while Litentry has no data
Commits
Arbitrum has 184,537 commits, while Litentry has no data
Stars
Arbitrum has 10,278 stars, while Litentry has no data
Watchers
Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers, while Litentry has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.