- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Injective
Arbitrum vs Injective Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 35.73 tx/s, while Injective has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Injective has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Injective has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 128,612 txns, while Injective has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Injective has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Injective has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Injective has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Injective has no data
Arbitrum vs Injective Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Injective has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Injective has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Injective have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Injective has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Injective has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Injective
Injective is the high-performance blockchain for finance, offering unmatched speed, scalability, and advanced infrastructure to power the future of on-chain finance.