Arbitrum vs Crust Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Crust TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 23,833X higher than Crust max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than Crust max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Crust transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 98.35% shorter than Crust block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Crust finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year before Crust
Arbitrum vs Crust Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.42% lower than Crust Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Crust
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Crust stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Arbitrum and Crust governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.