Compare Arbitrum vs Crust

Arbitrum vs Crust Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Crust TPS

Arbitrum logo
25.15 tx/s
Crust logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 23,833X higher than Crust max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
Crust logo
0.06 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than Crust max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Crust logo
1,500 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Crust transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
90.6K txns
Crust logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 98.11% shorter than Crust block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Crust logo
13.27s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Crust finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Crust logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Crust logo
Parachain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 1.58B total transactions, while Crust has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.58B txns
Crust logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year before Crust

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Crust logo
Nov 21, 2022

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.45% lower than Crust Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Crust logo
184

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Crust

Arbitrum logo
1
Crust logo
600

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Crust stake is $3.453B

Arbitrum logo
—
Crust logo
$3.453B

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Crust logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Crust governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Crust logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Developer Activity New

Developers

Arbitrum has 13X more developers than Crust

Arbitrum logo
2,318
Crust logo
178

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 1.73X more repos than Crust

Arbitrum logo
126
Crust logo
73

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 16X more commits than Crust

Arbitrum logo
185,209
Crust logo
11,661

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 9.82X more stars than Crust

Arbitrum logo
10,348
Crust logo
1,054

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 4.57X more watchers than Crust

Arbitrum logo
1,622
Crust logo
355

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Crust

Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Crust Socials