Compare Arbitrum vs Crust

Arbitrum vs Crust Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 100% higher than Crust TPS

Arbitrum logo
42.57 tx/s
Crust logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 23,833X higher than Crust max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
Crust logo
0.06 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 27X higher than Crust max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Crust logo
1,500 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 100% higher than Crust transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
153K txns
Crust logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 98% shorter than Crust block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Crust logo
12.48s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 28X longer than Crust finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Crust logo
30s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Crust is a parachain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Crust logo
Parachain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 1.66B total transactions, while Crust has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.66B txns
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 1 year before Crust

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Crust logo
Nov 21, 2022

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.45% lower than Crust Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Crust logo
183

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.83% fewer validators than Crust

Arbitrum logo
1
Crust logo
600

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Crust stake is $2.402B

Arbitrum logo
Crust logo
$2.402B

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Crust logo
Nominated Proof of Stake

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Crust governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Crust logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 13X more developers than Crust

Arbitrum logo
2,326
Crust logo
178

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 1.73X more repos than Crust

Arbitrum logo
128
Crust logo
74

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 16X more commits than Crust

Arbitrum logo
188,486
Crust logo
11,671

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 9.84X more stars than Crust

Arbitrum logo
10,422
Crust logo
1,059

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 4.64X more watchers than Crust

Arbitrum logo
1,619
Crust logo
349

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $12.79K, while Crust has no data

Arbitrum logo
$12.79K
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.004201, while Crust has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.004201
Crust logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 5.6X higher than Crust price

Arbitrum logo
$0.3005
Crust logo
$0.05369

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 2,181X higher than Crust market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.656B
Crust logo
$759.1K

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Crust Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Crust

Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Crust Socials