- Compare
- Waterfall vs Starknet
Waterfall vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 94.8% lower than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 33X higher than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 13X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 94.8% lower than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 1.7X longer than Starknet block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 99.69% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 3 years after Starknet
Waterfall vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators
Waterfall has 63,474X more validators than Starknet
Stake
Waterfall stake is $279K, while Starknet has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance
Waterfall vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.