Get listed on Chainspect

Compare Waterfall vs Starknet

Waterfall vs Starknet TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than Starknet TPS

Waterfall logo
0 tx/s
Starknet logo
1.01 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Waterfall max TPS is 218X higher than Starknet max TPS

Waterfall logo
83,333 tx/s
Starknet logo
381.6 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 42X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS

Waterfall logo
41,666 tx/s
Starknet logo
992 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than Starknet transaction volume

Waterfall logo
0 txns
Starknet logo
3.64K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than Starknet block time

Waterfall logo
0s
Starknet logo
1.7s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Waterfall finality is 99.69% shorter than Starknet finality

Waterfall logo
24s
Starknet logo
2h

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Waterfall has 89.33% fewer total transactions than Starknet

Waterfall logo
34.1M txns
Starknet logo
319M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Waterfall was launched 3 years after Starknet

Waterfall logo
Jul 17, 2024
Starknet logo
Nov 16, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient

Waterfall logo
1
Starknet logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Starknet

Waterfall logo
4
Starknet logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Waterfall and Starknet have no data

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Waterfall is PoS, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)

Waterfall logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Starknet logo
Rollup (ZK)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Waterfall council governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance

Waterfall logo
Council
Starknet logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs Starknet Developer Activity

Developers

Waterfall has 2.01X more developers than Starknet

Waterfall logo
791
Starknet logo
394

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Waterfall has 1.36X more commits than Starknet

Waterfall logo
23,574
Starknet logo
17,339

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Waterfall has 51.72% fewer repos than Starknet

Waterfall logo
14
Starknet logo
29

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Waterfall has 99.91% fewer stars than Starknet

Waterfall logo
3
Starknet logo
3,374

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Waterfall has 98.46% fewer watchers than Starknet

Waterfall logo
2
Starknet logo
130

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs Starknet Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet on-chain revenue is $3.912K

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
$3.912K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet average transaction fee is $0.03311

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
$0.03311

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet market cap is $486.2M

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
$486.2M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet FDV is $651.9M

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
$651.9M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet Market Cap to FDV ratio is 74.59%

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
74.59%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Waterfall has no data, while Starknet price is $0.06405

Waterfall logo
—
Starknet logo
$0.06405

Data from Chainspect

Waterfall vs Starknet Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow