Taraxa vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Taraxa TPS is 2.45X higher than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Taraxa max TPS is 4.44X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Taraxa max theoretical TPS is 1.25X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Taraxa transaction volume is 2.45X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Taraxa block time is 14X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Taraxa finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Taraxa is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Taraxa was launched 2 years after Arbitrum
Taraxa vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Taraxa Nakamoto Coefficient is 13X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Taraxa has 81X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Taraxa stake is 3.057B TARA, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Taraxa is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Taraxa council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Taraxa vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Taraxa Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Taraxa
Taraxa is a purpose-built, fast, scalable, and device-friendly public ledger designed to track informal transactions to minimize confusion & disputes.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.