- Compare
- Solana vs Starknet
Solana vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Solana TPS is 530X higher than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Solana max TPS is 12X higher than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Solana max theoretical TPS is 66X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Solana transaction volume is 530X higher than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Solana block time is 95.03% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
Solana finality is 99.83% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
Solana is a layer 1 blockchain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Solana was launched 2 years before Starknet
Solana vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Solana Nakamoto Coefficient is 21X higher than Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Solana has 1,040X more validators than Starknet
Stake
Solana stake is $73.29B, while Starknet has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Solana is PoS, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Solana off-chain governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance
Solana vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Solana Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.