- Compare
- Redbelly vs Abstract
Redbelly vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Redbelly TPS is 0.0078 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Transaction Volume
Redbelly transaction volume is 28 txns, while Abstract has no data
Block Time
Redbelly block time is 2m 13s, while Abstract has no data
Finality
Redbelly finality is 0s, while Abstract has no data
Type
Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain, while Abstract has no data
Launch Date
Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024, while the Abstract has no data
Redbelly vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Redbelly and Abstract have no data
Validators/Miners
Redbelly and Abstract have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Redbelly and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Redbelly is PoS, while Abstract has no data
Governance
Redbelly governance is council, while Abstract has no data
Other Comparisons
Redbelly Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.