Hedera vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Hedera TPS is 77.92% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Hedera max TPS is 2.99X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Hedera max theoretical TPS is 75% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Hedera transaction volume is 77.92% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Hedera block time is 8.01X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Hedera finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Hedera is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Hedera was launched 2 years before Arbitrum
Hedera vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Hedera Nakamoto Coefficient is 6X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Hedera has 30X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Hedera stake is 14.68B HBAR, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Hedera is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Hedera council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Hedera vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Hedera Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Hedera
Hedera operates as a public network employing the hashgraph consensus algorithm for rapid and secure transaction validation. Governed by a council of esteemed organizations, Hedera ensures consistent progress and decentralization. Distinguished by its high throughput, security, and fair transaction ordering, Hedera strives to establish a trust layer for the internet.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.