Celo vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Celo TPS is 76.76% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Celo max TPS is 80.26% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Celo max theoretical TPS is 98.8% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Celo transaction volume is 76.76% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Celo block time is 4.01X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Celo finality is 1.8X longer than Arbitrum finality
Type
Celo and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Celo was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
Celo vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Celo Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Celo and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Stake
Celo and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Celo and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Celo and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Celo vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Celo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.