Arbitrum vs Taraxa Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 95.53% lower than Taraxa TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 72.3% lower than Taraxa max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 19.99% lower than Taraxa max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 95.53% lower than Taraxa transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 93.44% shorter than Taraxa block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Taraxa finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Taraxa is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 2 years before Taraxa
Arbitrum vs Taraxa Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 92.3% lower than Taraxa Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 98.85% fewer validators than Taraxa
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Taraxa stake is $5.626M
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Taraxa is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Taraxa council governance
Arbitrum vs Taraxa Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Taraxa
Taraxa is a purpose-built, fast, scalable, and device-friendly public ledger designed to track informal transactions to minimize confusion & disputes.