Arbitrum vs NitroGraph Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 31.36 tx/s, while NitroGraph has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while NitroGraph has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while NitroGraph has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 112,913 txns, while NitroGraph has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while NitroGraph has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while NitroGraph has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while NitroGraph has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the NitroGraph has no data
Arbitrum vs NitroGraph Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while NitroGraph has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while NitroGraph has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and NitroGraph have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while NitroGraph has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while NitroGraph has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About NitroGraph
NitroGraph is the execution layer for AI agents. Built for teams who want to own their models, deploy autonomous agents, and monetize AI at scale.