- Compare
- Arbitrum vs NEAR
Arbitrum vs NEAR
Arbitrum vs NEAR Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 66.59% lower than NEAR TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 67.14% lower than NEAR max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 2.5X higher than NEAR max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 66.59% lower than NEAR transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 58.17% shorter than NEAR block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 1,380X longer than NEAR finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while NEAR is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after NEAR
Arbitrum vs NEAR Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 90% lower than NEAR Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.68% fewer validators than NEAR
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while NEAR stake is $1.554B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while NEAR is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than NEAR council governance
Arbitrum vs NEAR Developer Activity New
Developers
Arbitrum has 2X more developers than NEAR
Repos
Arbitrum has 40.28% fewer repos than NEAR
Commits
Arbitrum has 2.52X more commits than NEAR
Stars
Arbitrum has 1.08X more stars than NEAR
Watchers
Arbitrum has 1.11X more watchers than NEAR
Arbitrum vs NEAR Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About NEAR
NEAR is the chain abstraction stack, empowering builders to create apps that scale to billions of users and across all blockchains.