Arbitrum vs Cronos Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 21X higher than Cronos TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 7.8X higher than Cronos max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 7.42X higher than Cronos max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 21X higher than Cronos transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 53.95% shorter than Cronos block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Cronos finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Cronos is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 2 months before Cronos
Arbitrum vs Cronos Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Cronos Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99% fewer validators than Cronos
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Cronos stake is 11.95B CRO
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Cronos is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum and Cronos governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Cronos Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Cronos
Cronos emerges as an interoperable blockchain, streamlining the migration of applications and crypto assets from various chains while prioritizing low transaction costs, rapid throughput, and fast finalization times. It operates as an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chain, augmented with support for Inter-Blockchain Communications (IBC) networks based on the Cosmos SDK. This integration empowers developers to create and launch dApps atop the EVM infrastructure.