Bybit referral banner

Compare Arbitrum vs Cronos Network

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 34X higher than Cronos Network TPS

Arbitrum logo
7.22 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
0.21 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 14X higher than Cronos Network max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
141.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 1.13X higher than Cronos Network max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Cronos Network logo
5,390 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 34X higher than Cronos Network transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
26K txns
Cronos Network logo
762 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 31.06% shorter than Cronos Network block time

Arbitrum logo
327ms
Cronos Network logo
475ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Cronos Network finality is 0s

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Cronos Network logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 20X more total transactions than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
2.42B txns
Cronos Network logo
122M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 2 months before Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Cronos Network logo
Nov 8, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Cronos Network Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Cronos Network logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99% fewer validators than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
1
Cronos Network logo
100

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Cronos Network stake is $747M

Arbitrum logo
—
Cronos Network logo
$747M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Cronos Network is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Cronos Network logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Cronos Network governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Cronos Network logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 3.75X more developers than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
2,487
Cronos Network logo
664

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 11X more commits than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
219,880
Cronos Network logo
19,562

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 4.69X more repos than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
136
Cronos Network logo
29

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 9.33X more stars than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
10,864
Cronos Network logo
1,164

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 11X more watchers than Cronos Network

Arbitrum logo
1,457
Cronos Network logo
134

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 14X higher than Cronos Network on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$9.66K
Cronos Network logo
$690

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 23.44% lower than Cronos Network average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.0107
Cronos Network logo
$0.014

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 56.64% lower than Cronos Network market cap

Arbitrum logo
$1.13B
Cronos Network logo
$2.6B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 68.07% lower than Cronos Network FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1.64B
Cronos Network logo
$5.12B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.36X higher than Cronos Network Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
Cronos Network logo
50.75%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 3.19X higher than Cronos Network price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1635
Cronos Network logo
$0.05122

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Cronos Network Real-time TPS Chart

Be first to know when a network sets a record. Live updates on CoinMarketCap

Follow on CoinMarketCap