- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Celo
Arbitrum vs Celo Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 1.16X higher than Celo TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 5.07X higher than Celo max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 84X higher than Celo max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 1.16X higher than Celo transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 75.03% shorter than Celo block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 44.35% shorter than Celo finality
Type
Arbitrum and Celo are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Celo
Arbitrum vs Celo Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Celo Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum and Celo have the same amount of validators
Stake
Arbitrum and Celo have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum and Celo are both Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Arbitrum and Celo governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Celo Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.