- Compare
- Abstract vs Redbelly
Abstract vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly TPS is 0.0078 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly max TPS is 73,158 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly max theoretical TPS is 666,970 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly transaction volume is 28 txns
Block Time
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly block time is 2m 13s
Finality
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly finality is 0s
Type
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly was launched on Nov 28, 2024
Abstract vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Abstract and Redbelly have no data
Validators/Miners
Abstract and Redbelly have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Abstract and Redbelly have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly is PoS
Governance
Abstract has no data, while Redbelly governance is council
Other Comparisons
Abstract Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.