Zeitgeist vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Zeitgeist TPS is 100% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Zeitgeist max TPS is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Zeitgeist max theoretical TPS is 96.25% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Zeitgeist transaction volume is 100% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Zeitgeist block time is 54X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Zeitgeist finality is 96.37% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Zeitgeist is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Zeitgeist was launched 4 months after Arbitrum
Zeitgeist vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Zeitgeist Nakamoto Coefficient is 174X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Zeitgeist has 600X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Zeitgeist stake is $2.947B, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Zeitgeist is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Zeitgeist and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Zeitgeist vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Zeitgeist Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Zeitgeist
Zeitgeist is a decentralized network designed for establishing, wagering on, and settling prediction markets, enabling users to craft intricate financial agreements on a wide range of subjects. The platform's native currency, ZTG, serves to influence the network's direction and acts as a final recourse for dispute resolution within its decentralized court system.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.