Compare Waterfall vs Etherlink

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than Etherlink TPS

0 tx/s

1.64 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 2,544X higher than Etherlink max TPS

83,333 tx/s

32.76 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 32X higher than Etherlink max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

1,286 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than Etherlink transaction volume

0 txns

5.89K txns

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than Etherlink block time

0s

1.32s

Waterfall finality is 1.33X longer than Etherlink finality

24s

18s

Waterfall has 66.88% fewer total transactions than Etherlink

34.1M txns

103M txns

Waterfall was launched 7 months before Etherlink

Jul 17, 2024

Feb 25, 2025

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Etherlink

4

1

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Etherlink is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Etherlink on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 4.39X more developers than Etherlink

791

180

Waterfall has 4.88X more commits than Etherlink

23,574

4,829

Waterfall has 22.22% fewer repos than Etherlink

14

18

Waterfall has 86.95% fewer stars than Etherlink

3

23

Waterfall has 66.66% fewer watchers than Etherlink

2

6

Waterfall has no data, while Etherlink on-chain revenue is $62.41

—

$62.41

Waterfall has no data, while Etherlink average transaction fee is $0.0003603

—

$0.0003603

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—