Compare Waterfall vs Etherlink

Waterfall TPS is 85.23% lower than Etherlink TPS

0.37 tx/s

2.52 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 990X higher than Etherlink max TPS

32,434 tx/s

32.76 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 32X higher than Etherlink max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

1,286 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 85.25% lower than Etherlink transaction volume

1.34K txns

9.05K txns

Waterfall block time is 2.7X longer than Etherlink block time

3.08s

1.14s

Waterfall finality is 1.33X longer than Etherlink finality

24s

18s

Waterfall has 67.42% fewer total transactions than Etherlink

31.7M txns

97.3M txns

Waterfall was launched 7 months before Etherlink

Jul 17, 2024

Feb 25, 2025

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Etherlink

4

1

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Etherlink is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Etherlink on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 4.39X more developers than Etherlink

791

180

Waterfall has 4.89X more commits than Etherlink

23,540

4,816

Waterfall has 22.22% fewer repos than Etherlink

14

18

Waterfall has 86.95% fewer stars than Etherlink

3

23

Waterfall has 66.66% fewer watchers than Etherlink

2

6

Waterfall has no data, while Etherlink on-chain revenue is $56.83

—

$56.83

Waterfall has no data, while Etherlink average transaction fee is $0.0002823

—

$0.0002823

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—

Waterfall and Etherlink have no data

—

—