- Compare
- Scroll vs Polkadex
Scroll vs Polkadex Scalability
Real-time TPS
Scroll TPS is 100% higher than Polkadex TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 161X higher than Polkadex max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 90.93% lower than Polkadex max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Scroll transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadex transaction volume
Block Time
Scroll block time is 88.03% shorter than Polkadex block time
Finality
Scroll finality is 386X longer than Polkadex finality
Type
Scroll is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polkadex is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 2 years after Polkadex
Scroll vs Polkadex Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Polkadex has no data
Validators
Scroll has 1 validators, while Polkadex has no data
Stake
Scroll and Polkadex have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll is Rollup (ZK), while Polkadex is PoS
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Polkadex on-chain governance
Scroll vs Polkadex Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Polkadex
Polkadex is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Polkadot network. It offers high-performance, low-latency trading with a fully decentralized order book. Users can trade assets across different parachains within the Polkadot ecosystem and external blockchains connected via bridges. Polkadex uses L2 scaling solutions for fast, efficient trading and operates on a non-custodial model, allowing users to retain control of their funds at all times.