- Compare
- Integritee vs Arbitrum
Integritee vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Integritee TPS is 99.62% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Integritee max TPS is 98.69% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Integritee max theoretical TPS is 96.25% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Integritee transaction volume is 99.62% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Integritee block time is 51X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Integritee finality is 96.37% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Integritee is a parachain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Integritee was launched 7 months after Arbitrum
Integritee vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Integritee Nakamoto Coefficient is 278X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Integritee has 1,000X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Integritee stake is 7.866M KSM, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Integritee is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Integritee and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Integritee vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Integritee Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Integritee
Integritee is a blockchain project focused on providing privacy-preserving solutions for dApps and smart contracts. It aims to enable confidential computing on public blockchains, allowing sensitive data to be processed securely without compromising privacy. Integritee utilizes trusted execution environments (TEEs), such as Intel SGX, to create secure enclaves where data can be processed confidentially. This ensures that data remains encrypted and inaccessible to anyone, including the network validators or operators, while it is being processed. This idea opens up new possibilities for privacy-focused applications in finance, healthcare, and so on.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.